I have been wondering since the beginning of this meeting how all those organizations manage to coordinate their efforts.
For example, after the Japanese tsunami, that country had very specific needs. It had a government and local administrations that were able to determine what was needed and to submit those needs to the countries able to provide assistance. In a way, it was a sort of ideal situation for emergency relief.
On the other hand, in a country where there is no government, no laws, no police, and where the parliament as well as the police stations have been destroyed, the number of local counterparts is close to zero. So, how can the international organizations and foreign countries develop an effective strategy? Does this kind of situation not lead to a lot of ineffectiveness?
I am not a specialist but when I heard about the earthquake, my first thought was that the absence of sanitation infrastructure would lead to a cholera outbreak that would be horrible. As a matter of fact, I wonder if it is not the time needed to set up such a sanitation infrastructure that has caused that outbreak. I wonder if all the respondents were able to set up a strategy for putting in place some kind of decision-making authority.
As they say in English,
money can solve only money problems.
I see that we are in a situation where a lot of money has been spent with the best intentions, but only a fraction of the expected results has been obtained.
I am not trying to criticize your actions or those of our government but I wonder if we have not reached the point where we should step back and rethink. I believe that we should develop a long-term strategy that would allow us, as well as all the other organizations and countries, to act in a way that would bring concrete results in the medium and long term.