All right. The next question is about the governance model of Denmark and Greenland, which is very different from that of Canada, of course. Denmark is effectively the Kingdom of Denmark, so it consists of Denmark, the Faeroe Islands, and Greenland. Greenland has self-government, as you know. It was voted for in 2009. It's all embedded in an act, ratified and passed by both parliaments. It lays out very clear rules, engagements, and conditions for Greenlandic sovereignty, so to speak. There's a formula in there as to how much of the money from resource development Greenland can keep and how much the block grant will be sort of clawed back as they get richer and richer.
In the wake of the act, all the discussion about them not being an equal partner, never getting to sit at the table, and never getting to do this has all died. They are actually now the masters of their own destiny. They can decide what they want. Foreign policy is not a jurisdiction of Greenland. It's negotiated through Copenhagen. But in the Arctic Council, you will see that the senior Arctic official from Copenhagen sits side by side with the senior Arctic official from Greenland. There will be two government representatives at the table. So it's not handled through the permanent participants, the PPs; it's actually handled in a government-to-government conversation.
I know that's not feasible in Canada because there is a different structure, but that's the way it works for us. So there is autonomy for Greenland, but in very close cooperation with Denmark.