I would say that it's not an either/or situation. To me, the value of the University of the Arctic is that it does connect the learning and research that is happening across the north. That informs the Arctic Council, where parliamentarians can have the discussions that need to happen. The value of education by northerners is that those issues will be addressed by the people who are actually experiencing them.
I think the University of the Arctic is critical to provide that knowledge, but it is probably not the place for those conversations.