Thank you very much. I hope I have understood your question.
I think that right now what I also want to clarify is that I represent OCHA, the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. The United Nations are much bigger and the political affairs.... The DPKO, their peace-keeping operations department, will also have their say, but as far as humanitarian affairs are concerned, I do believe that right now we are facing acute needs, and these needs must be addressed.
So I'm sure that we can rely on Canada's support through the CAP 2013 to enable us to respond to these needs. But we all understand here that basically responding to the emergency needs as such will not solve the deeper development issues within the country, and we also understand the necessity to invest in resilience. I would say that investing in resilience today will be more cost-effective if we do it right and in a well-coordinated manner. It means that in the future we will be spending less on humanitarian-type activities, because, again, the idea is that through resilience the capacity of communities to face shocks is strengthened.
If we manage to build this well-coordinated continuum between emergency and development aid, if we are adequately and strategically supporting the restoration of state services in the poorest and most isolated areas—and basically we have the communities that create value thanks to your funding—in that case these values and this money will be reinvested indefinitely. It will be trickling down to other sectors, such as education.