Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
It's a very good question: how does one use the bilateral relationship to act both as an incentive and as a deterrent in this case and, indeed, in other cases? Maybe I'll start with some very specific examples and then go to the more general.
In this specific case, immediately after the trial had taken place our ambassador in Kiev went to see the deputy foreign minister to deliver some very clear messages about what Canadian views might be, and I did the same thing here with the Ukrainian chargé. We had a very frank conversation about the Canadian view of what we see as a very much politically motivated trial and signalled that there would be implications for the nature of our relationship, which has traditionally been a very warm one.
In terms of other specific actions, it is very much on a case-by-case basis and not specific to Ukraine. We look at issues such as agreements that might be under discussion. We look at issues such as visits, at opportunities to deliver messages and to see how those might be used in one way or another. There are numbers of opportunities one can use to signal displeasure and to also at the same time encourage a different approach.