To add to what Renée said, I don't want to leave the impression with the committee that we're not doing joint international research. We're actually doing an awful lot of it.
In the eastern Arctic we do multi-species surveys on a cyclical basis. We do that with Greenland. We share the stocks with them, so under the NAFO arrangements for shrimp, turbot, and everything else that's up there, we share the costs and we share the platform. That's been going on for quite some time. I don't see any reason to change that.
In the western Arctic, in the Beaufort and that kind of area, there's collaboration with the Alaskans and with NOAA and others to use common assets, share the data, and share the costs. We are doing that. The issue is, what do you do with someone who parks on mile one outside the boundary? That's where you really have to establish a coalition of the willing.
At this point, as Renée said, there's not really seen to be a viable market. We're looking at small and not quickly reproducing fish, so up to this point in time it has not been a big concern, but we continue to do the analysis and to do the research to see what's out there. Obviously, if oil and gas are going to come before fisheries, we want to know what the potential impacts on that would be.