I'm convinced it's going to move forward very smoothly. First of all, in terms of machinery of government changes, I've been a public servant my whole career and I've seen a number, including in the Department of Foreign Affairs. There's a lot of expertise on how to go about doing that.
In terms of gaps in programming, I don't see any indication of why that would occur, because what's being amalgamated is all of the Canadian International Development Agency's mandate. It's changing and bringing its minister into a new structure under this act. It's bringing in its programming, and its priorities are clearly spelled out in the bill and in the budget statement, so there really is no ambiguity about the fact that development is now going to be at the core of Canada's international interests, as it says in the budget. We're putting that into an expression in terms of a new institutional and bureaucratic structure to deliver on that mandate.
I don't know if you want to add anything, Nadir?