Sure. I think the key difficulty that you run into with the kinds of recommendations that Mr. Ruggie put forward, which I think have been generally well received and well respected, has to do with two things—the difference between, on the one hand, respecting human rights, which pretty much everyone agrees everyone has to do, versus, on the other hand, promoting human rights. We all promote human rights. The harder question becomes how far down a supply chain is a Canadian manufacturer responsible for ensuring that human rights are respected?
So when it's not just a subcontractor, it's a subcontractor to a subcontractor, there it becomes much harder. It starts to strain our general sensibilities about what counts as fair and what counts as an action for which I or a company could be responsible, when it's far enough away that it starts to become implausible that I could have any direct control.
I think the obligation to respect human rights is clear and pretty much airtight. The other part about promoting, or there's another word he uses.... At that point it becomes much more an aspirational thing, and something where I think companies need to try to figure out just how far we can plausibly go to achieve goals that we all agree are worthy ones, but there may be practical limitations.