When we had our pledging at the replenishment conference in Brussels in April, we presented the $15 billion. We described the $15 billion in a slightly different way. This is not about the Global Fund as an institution. I wouldn't say the Global Fund needs $15 billion. What we said was the countries need $15 billion. That would help them to complement their own activities so that we can get above 80% in coverage, so that we reach so many people that we can reach this tipping point in the fight against the diseases. This is not about the Global Fund as an institution. It is about what we can contribute so that we can really control and eliminate these diseases. Yes, if we get $12 billion, $13 billion, or $14 billion, that's the money we will make available, but we will reach fewer people. We will struggle for even longer to really fight these diseases to the end, and we might see some re-emergence of epidemics in the meantime. We've seen that. If we stop delivering the bed nets, malaria comes back in a moment. We need to drive it down to a level where it can't get back to an epidemic level.
We have this opportunity, but we will—