Nothing is impossible, but if you framed a bill—and we didn't do detailed advice on this—with an offence that included “investment”, you would have to do a federal-provincial analysis, for example, because property and civil rights are provincial concerns. The criminal law is a federal concern. So there would have to be an analysis there.
Parliament may criminalize things, but it may not regulate investment, or there is a limit on how far it can go. Again, I haven't done the research on that. There is that issue.
There is also the question of uncertainty under the charter. My professional colleagues on Bay Street in Toronto probably know what “investment” means, but I'm not sure a Canadian criminal court judge would know. It would be very difficult.