In the case of War Child, for good or for bad it demonstrates a reality on something we've been emphasizing over the course of this afternoon. That is, most of the situations where War Child has been are over 10 years now because most of those situations are protracted conflicts. We've gone through quite a few ebbs and flows in terms of active conflict and lesser so.
For the organization, ideally the decision on the disengagement is when there's local capacity—the local partners who have been part of the capacity-building strategy with the organization and the work on the ground—and when the light is there that they are going to continue with the work themselves, and that they are sort of ready to move forward. In most of the countries where we are now, that capacity hasn't been possible yet because of the continuation of the conflict. But there have been other situations, certainly, where that decision has presented itself, and it really comes down to believing that the local community's capacity has been set to continue the work themselves.