Thank you for the question.
I was so focused in response to Mr. Dewar's question about local-level advocacy in country that I didn't actually respond to your question about what the Canadian government should do.
Broadly, there is a trade, diplomacy, and development role for the Canadian government. Around trade, it really is looking at the supply chain and the kinds of agreements we have; looking to ensure that child labour isn't part of that; looking at the link to informal education that's happening at the peer-to-peer level in the streets of Cambodia. And in terms of how it's directly linked, we have to ensure that there are safe alternatives for children to have. It is not enough to be aware that you need to be protected, and aware that you shouldn't be involved in child labour, but to also have those decent employment options out there.
Around diplomacy, the Canadian government has done a great job at highlighting the particular issue of early forced marriage. Informal education deals with the underlying root causes of early forced marriage. It deals with issues of discrimination, of societal norms, of mothers' and grandmothers' ideas about when children should marry and the pressure they're under to have their children married early, so that, again, is the link to informal education.
As to the way in which we can get at this through our development programs, I'm thrilled to see the interest of the development minister around child protection. I look forward to seeing that the same kind of leadership role Canada has played on maternal and newborn child health sees a similar role around child protection, and that we invest in proven interventions that we know work, don't cost a lot of money, and really make a difference in children's lives.