I want to follow that up a bit. The other day we heard that the numbers of Canadian soldiers who could possibly be involved in this would be extremely, extremely limited, if there ever were any. Then we have this discussion about active participation. We've talked about transit over Canadian airspace, and about the possibility of close air support in a combat situation.
I'm just wondering how practical it is for us to then say to one of our non-signatories, and I'm thinking particularly of the U.S., that they need to change their armaments in order to accommodate our desires and our requirements in a combat situation. Is that practical at all?