Just very briefly, I would say that we have the same problem in the United States, obviously, of some Muslims being radicalized. I think on balance the answer to this....
It sounds like I think the answer to every problem is religious freedom, but religious freedom includes the right, even in a secular society, for religious people to bring their views into the public square. I think to the extent the United States has been successful in doing this, it's because religious freedom means that Muslims can bring their ideas into the public square but they can be challenged. We have a constant dialogue about what Islam means. It's not always a happy dialogue. It hasn't worked perfectly—I mean, we have our own radicals—but at the end of the day, I think for the kind of secularism that removes religion from the public square, that is not supportive of the kind of liberalism and tolerance that Mr. Halevi speaks of. It is the kind of religious freedom and secularism that invites religion into the public square within the norms of democracy that can help.