We tend to focus on the military defeat of ISIL. You've pointed out that one of the things we should be able to do better is to try to exploit their loss of momentum and to more effectively show how they're being stopped and in some cases reversed.
This question is for all three of you, whoever wants to weigh in.
ISIL needs not only this momentum that you speak of, but it also needs money. It needs recruits. It needs weapons. Quite apart from the challenges of governance that come after all of this is hopefully concluded, how effectively is the west or the coalition dealing with trying to strangle them from the funding, from the recruiting, and from the weapons point of view? It's a very broad question.