Let's keep it simple. I think the starting point is to make that clear distinction and to recognize, as Martin said, the primacy of the humanitarian imperative: the delivery of impartial, neutral, and independent aid.
Now, this is not a silver bullet that's going to allows us to operate without problems—it's obviously much more complicated than that—but it is a key element to allow us to position ourselves as humanitarian agencies, and where possible, to negotiate access, managing the perceptions of the belligerents on the ground. In that sense, this is very much the starting point for us in terms of getting our operations going and allowing us access to the very most vulnerable.
On a broader, more political level, I think the Canadian voice, in advocating for humanitarian access, advocating on behalf of the humanitarian principles, and advocating on behalf of a sustainable peace process wherever those opportunities and avenues may exist, is critical in moving this forward.
We have a humanitarian engagement on the ground; there are military operations taking place. There has to be a political platform as well, at the right moment—I'm not saying it can be achieved tomorrow or in the short term, but we have to bear it in mind—to take us to a sustained solution to this very dramatic crisis.