Thank you very much, Mr. Chair. I will be sharing my time with Ms. Liu.
Thank you very much, Mr. Drolet. I am happy to see you again. Your presentation was excellent and very useful. You really covered every aspect of the issue.
My thanks also go to Ms. Chayer for providing us with some very relevant additional information.
I really liked the comment that we should interpret article 21 with article 1 in mind, because article 1 defines the fundamental objectives of the convention. At previous committee meetings, the opposite was suggested, meaning that we should interpret article 1 with article 21 in mind. To me, that defies logic. So I was very glad to hear your comments.
In terms of implementing the convention, would you agree that the Canadian bill is the weakest or one of the weakest? Could you also comment on how you see the potential impact of that on other countries?