First of all, I think I should start with the MNCH. As you know, in 2010 we committed a total of $2.85 billion over five years, from 2010 up to 2015. I'm glad to report that all of this money has been disbursed. This is how Canada is recognized: it pays what it pledges.
It has been a good tranche, and now we are going with a second tranche, as you know. The Prime Minister announced $3.5 billion over the next five years, from 2015 to 2020, so of course there are more resources. The idea is to make sure that we can reach beyond the low-hanging fruit.
We need to do more. The summit that we held in Toronto I think sent a good signal to the entire world to ask what we can do better in terms of immunization, in terms of nutrition, in terms of a civil registration and vital statistics system, and with the newborns. There is still work to do, but we are very confident that we will achieve more. This is why we've also announced this pledge of $500 million to Gavi. Of course, we are also very active in the Global Fund. We increased our participation there by 20% from when we announced that in 2014.
The idea is that we are happy to be active where we can make a difference. Canada is well recognized in regard to the MNCH initiative, and we intend to do this.
You alluded to Tanzania. Tanzania is a good partner on this, and Prime Minister Harper commissioned a report, with Jakaya Kikwete, on accountability and transparency. This is why we were very proud to launch, in New York City during the UN General Assembly, the Global Fund finance facility, in which, once again, money is earmarked for MNCH and the building of the CRVS, the civil registration and vital statistics system.
Beyond this, of course, we have 25 countries of focus that were designated last June, plus 15 partner countries, more or less. We've talked about Iraq, and Iraq is now a partner country.
In terms of bilaterals, now what we want to do is keep this good work that has been done in the last five years and stay focused, not dispersed, in terms of long-term development. Other interesting countries like Jordan, Burma, and Mongolia are now in, because of course we see opportunities for us to help in building sustainable economic growth and in making a difference to eradicate poverty.
I'm giving you a quick snapshot, but I think things are going for the best. It is also all in line with what we see. I sense that there is a better coordination among the donors.
We're talking also about blending finance, because as I alluded to in my previous remarks, ODA is not enough. We have to go to ODA-plus. So how can we do that? How can we engage private sector foundations and the diasporas? The diasporas have good knowledge that can be shared. They already do things, and they make huge remittances, but there are fees on this. How can we manage this all together in order to be more effective?
These are very interesting files on which we are working now to make sure that we are more effective in this 21st century with the means that we have in front of us.