I don't entirely agree with you.
Today, the network we have established has eight partners. They produce and use peanuts, of which 90% are locally produced. Of course, before the harvest, when the storage bins are empty, there is a shortage of peanuts. We bring them in from Argentina mainly, and from some other countries. However, 90% of the peanuts are produced locally. On average, 85% of the basic ingredients are produced locally.
We use the oil and sugar that we can find. We cannot find milk powder, of course, so until such time as we can develop that industry, we will continue to send products from the north to help malnourished children.
So today, that means creating skills, jobs, developing an economy and not just providing aid as we have always done by sending products from the north to the south. We can do it. It is complicated, of course; they would not be called developing countries if industrial production in Niger, for example, was simple.
Look, I run a company in France. We produce 40,000 tonnes a year. I do not know whether I would be able to make the 2,000 tonnes they make in Niger every year because the economic environment is more complicated. They are not protected as we tend to be in Europe. The United States helps its industries too. They impose import tariffs.
So life is a lot more complicated, but it can be done and we have to push for it to be done. That is where assistance has to be provided. We have to buy locally, at least when there are local products to buy. That is still not possible everywhere, but those economies have to be assisted if, one day, we want to stop sending products to malnourished children.