It's a very interesting question. Actually going back to Mr. Schellenberger's comment, I think it ties in nicely because one of the issues that we deal with when we talk about the rule of law is the capacity of people to speak out and say, look, something's wrong, we need to get some change here. And are they safe in doing that? Again, I go back to when I worked at IDRC and one of my colleagues challenged us. She said it's very well for us to tell people to go out and do advocacy but are we willing to stand next to them and actually go to jail with them when they're rounded up for speaking out? So I think the whole issue of advocacy needs to be looked at and I think there are markers within the advocacy process of what is it we can be saying that if you achieve this then you've made progress. You might not be able to get to the full nine yards, but if you've gotten to two yards that's amazing and we accept that and we paid for that and that's fantastic. But how do we then protect those people who are the advocates?
