I would say that you really have to take the historical aspects into consideration. The governance issue is very different, I would say, in northern Canada than it is in Greenland. Greenland has great aspirations but complete territorial sovereignty. I'm not sure if that's where any of the Inuit communities are going toward.
I would argue that there are also a lot of vulnerabilities that exist still in Greenland. The human aspects are suicide, lack of infrastructure.... There are many similarities.
Rather than asking what we can learn from that model, I would think that because there are so many differences in where northern Canada, Canadians and Inuit in Canada want to go, versus where the Greenlanders expect to go in the future, maybe it's about how we can work together better. Already, Inuit in northern Canada and in Greenland are looking for ways that they can better connect.
The big issue for them is how they can do better trade. There's discussion about making a free trade agreement between Inupiat in Alaska, Inuit in Canada and Greenlanders. For them, they're looking for ways that they can co-operate better together, I think, rather than specific models. Both have vulnerabilities and advantages in their own way, I would say—apples and oranges.