It seems then that, although there are other options for dealing with that issue, the current legislation provides a strong and effective framework for responding to that.
On the issue of consideration, it seems like a pretty “out there” speculation that somebody would attempt a prosecution on the basis of someone's expenses getting covered. Covering someone's expenses so they can provide a voluntary service seems very different from doing something for consideration. In any event, there's prosecutorial discretion but there's also the requirement of sign-off from the Attorney General.
Do you think that is sufficient to ensure a minimally reasonable reading of this as well as those elements of discretion?
Do you think that is sufficient to respond to potential concerns around a wild misinterpretation of the concept of consideration?