Thank you very much for your comments and your support. Those questions were tough but fair, so thank you for that.
If you'll allow me, I'll add one issue on the inadmissibility provisions, which I neglected to mention during my introductory remarks. The provisions around inadmissibility to Canada in the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act right now deal with gross criminality as grounds for inadmissibility.
In some cases, when we deal with organ harvesting, there are cases of people who are not breaking any law in the country where they are, but they are still in a gross violation of human rights. That is one of the reasons why I think those immigration provisions that are part of this legislation are very important. People could be acting as they are directed, carrying out terrible human rights abuses in a country such as China, where this is a matter of state policy. Those people, I believe, should still be able to be considered under the inadmissibility provisions, because they're involved in a gross violation of human rights.
That's an important area where this law is advancing the discussion. There are cases, yes, where people could be involved in organ harvesting, who are also breaking the law in the country where they are, and those people could be considered inadmissible on both grounds. But there are certainly cases where the new provisions are necessary.
I just add that to my comments at the beginning.