That's correct.
In testimony we heard earlier this week, and more specifically from Mr. Matas, there had been some debate around the financial transaction paragraph in clause 2, and he provided some helpful insights. He referenced the wording used in the Istanbul declaration, and I believe it provides, once again, greater clarity.
I move that in clause 2, we replace lines 28 to 30 on page 2 with the following:
person, knowing that it was obtained for consideration for the purposes of exploitation, or being reckless as to whether or not it was obtained for those reasons.
The key wording there is “for the purposes of exploitation”. That comes from that Istanbul declaration. As I mentioned, that was a very helpful suggestion from Mr. David Matas.