If I can just interject, I want to pose something else to you.
The Istanbul Protocol, which has been referenced here and is where the exploitation language came from, does reference a number of scenarios where money can change hands. These include paying the donor of the organ for lost wages, medical expenses and medications. A number of items are listed that would be deemed excluded, which I suppose is the intent of the exploitation language there.
What are your thoughts on addressing that list of possible reasons that money might change hands, none of which go to the root of the exploitation category?