Thanks very much. I'll take the question, and my colleagues can jump in as required.
As you very rightly point out, the Arctic is an area of critical importance to us, and extraordinarily vulnerable as well. I think it's a very positive development that the budget did provide additional funding to fulfill a number of those areas where we needed to work. Sustainable development was one of them. You mentioned ensuring the permanent participation of the indigenous organizations, so that we have a very inclusive process as we go forward in developing our approach and strategy.
Part of the money will go to a permanent secretariat for the sustainable development working group. We also have money to engage and support youth in the region, so that's a big step, and will help us. There's also money to engage UArctic, which is a sort of consortium of universities and institutes that will really help us build structure and intellectual foundations, as we go forward.
I'd also mention that we're renewing the Arctic policy framework. This is all with a view to an inclusive process where we engage northerners first, indigenous groups and all levels of government in order to militate toward a really sound basis for our strategy. As you said, climate change is presenting a very real threat to us in that region, which is disproportionately affected by what is happening. All of these efforts are meant to buttress and support how we can move securely into the future.