I'm asking because I know that stability means something. “Certainty” is a better term. I've heard from a person from an association and from CSOs that the FIAP is chronically underfunded. There have been questions about how you have gotten the results that you have claimed given that you haven't provided public data.
Again, we need solid information or solid data to at least communicate and understand how far this is going and why, as we say, there is a lot of noise but not so much wheat. We've seen a lot of noise, but there are no results to be seen. If the CSOs are complaining and they are saying the FIAP is underfunded, we need to understand from the department where you are going with this.
Changing the gender levels at your discretion from level zero to level one is, in my opinion, sometimes like changing a financial statement in a way to change the bottom line. I would like to hear from you if that is the case and where you are going with this.
Again, clarity is very, very important so we are able to communicate those results to CSOs.