That's what is not being translated for civil society or even for ourselves as opposition parties. When we look at it on paper, it doesn't seem to be explained properly, or at least to be understandable. We seem to get all these answers only at committee, and we're trying to get them from you today.
Why is the department not embracing that ethos—the Prime Minister is supposed to be called transparent by default—and publicly providing the information that parliamentarians and civil society require to hold you to account?