I would just add that I'm not familiar with any specifics either, but I think there are a lot of criteria that are consistent with the ambitions of focusing. There are a lot of assessments on, let's say, the quality of the projects within particular countries, to make sure that they are of high quality. Again, as we said, if you have three times the budget, you can do three times the number of countries at the same level per country, but the question is what you do in each place and what's the size, the scale of the footprint, that the country commits to taking on as a global responsibility.
We can have an offline discussion regarding the debates about scale, but I would just say I don't know a single developing-country finance minister who wants more small projects unless it's as a test. I think that, roughly speaking, they want to minimize the administrative burden. They want to have transparency in what they're doing—on both sides—and it's a matter of making sure there is a coordinated approach in which the approach of the external partners matches the strategy of the domestic partners, and ultimately the problem they're trying to solve, in some cases, might involve tweaking a lever on the regulatory side. In another case, it might be a matter of how many people have access to essential medicines, because people are dying for want of a pill. Each problem has its own implications with regard to how well we're doing in helping to solve it.