Thank you to all of you and thanks to your organizations for the wonderful work that you have all achieved in and beyond countries of focus and for the straight talk today. Very often NGOs in testifying in policy considerations tend to walk a very discreet middle path, not wanting to be offside from the ultimate policy decision that's taken.
Given the political ingredient in development assistance for either natural disasters—Haiti, the earthquake, a very significant part of our funding envelope, both bilateral and otherwise, has gone there—Afghanistan, which in the current year is the largest recipient; and for your suggestions that the focus be on poverty where it exists, not on impoverished countries. I'm just wondering, for the purpose of the country of focus bilateral aid envelope, whether 25 is too large a number. Should it be smaller with a better division of resources to focus on the countries of focus? I'd like to ask each of you, and if so, 15 countries, 20 countries?