If we focus on too large a number of countries, then yes, it's very difficult to have a sustainable impact. This is why we're suggesting keeping the current 20-to-25 country approach. That being said, though, under the framework of the SDGs, it's not only a country approach but really a focus on the populations that are most vulnerable. Going back to the evidence, it could very much be a thematic approach around girls and women that our ODA could take.
The other issue, though, is that currently 90% of our bilateral funding goes toward priority countries. Given the fragility we're seeing around the world, the protracted crises, it may be that we want to decrease that percentage and increase the percentage of flexibility just given the nature of what's happening around the world right now in terms of crises becoming more protracted and more reoccurring.