Maybe not just to echo my colleagues, though I fully agree with everything they have said, I think it's also about building on the historic strength of the Canadian government's investments in ODA. Over the last decade or so, we have made significant investments and strides in the maternal, newborn, and child health file, for example. It would be a shame to see that thematic focus derailed by decreased investment. I think that in order to be able to scale up and have impact in the long term, we want to stay the course in some thematic areas where we have had those historic investments.
I do think it is a delicate balance between being geographically focused in order to continue to generate evidence and focused on building and sustaining impact in some of the countries where we've historically worked. It's also recognizing that if we are to reach the most deprived and the most marginalized, we do really need a shift in terms of strategy. That might mean changing some of the mechanisms of financing and how we do financing for some of the work that we do.