In the interests of time, I'll limit myself to one question. It is for Professor Zyla, and it continues along the lines of the terrorism-development nexus. Development has always been challenged in conflict and post-conflict, post-disaster, fragile states by political vacuums, governance vacuums, corruption and so forth.
You began to describe the new phenomenon of al Qaeda-type terrorism and its variants and replicants. With ISIS, we're now seeing copycats coming up in different parts of the world claiming to be associated with it. Perhaps they are; we don't know. We're now seeing states, for example, Libya, South Sudan, Congo, where there are not simply domestic, national terror organizations, but there are also those that are following the ideological or non-ideological lead of more successful terrorist groups in other parts of the world. We're almost getting into hemispheric cross-pollination.
I'm wondering what your conclusion or your prediction is in on how that is going to have an even further impact on share of the big development aid envelope. In other words, is every program susceptible to this new and spreading terror phenomenon?