Yes, but there's also a danger in trying to change legislation to go after that one person. You may find unintended consequences for everybody else. And can you imagine the extra burden on the banks to have to go through millions of transactions to make sure that, perhaps, he or she wasn't involved in some way, shape, or form?
I remember an article written by Kim Richard Nossal based on James Eayrs, who many of you will know, who always counselled for Canada that the best foreign policy is when we stay in the middle. We don't become too idealistic and finger wagging and we don't think of ourselves as a great power. We steer that middle road.
Given the legislation that we have and that limitation on not being able to reach into other states—which I don't think we want to be able to do—realistically there's not a lot Canada can do. That doesn't mean, as Sue Eckert said, that the purpose of putting sanctions in place can signal this is not on, and it can start to develop a norm. That's very important, but it's not a tool to compel change.