Certainly, it's recognized that in the United Nations, for instance, it is increasingly difficult to get a Security Council resolution for states to act in that forum multilaterally.
I would, though, recommend ways to ensure that multilateral action takes place, even if it is with a coalition of the willing. Right now, SEMA provides authority for Canada to act entirely unilaterally. It's just that, in practice, Canada hasn't done that. It's fairly broad in allowing Canada to act on its own if it wishes. That's one point.
The second point is that it would be important to anchor the provisions to some kind of threshold. I think the ones that are recommended by Mr. Bezan with respect to.... Not having spoken to him about the bill, I can picture using the text, as it is reflected, in the example of a well-known human rights activist being killed by extra-judicial processes in a country, and using legislation to call that country or the people involved to account. Anchoring it to the activities of the people whose human rights have been grossly violated would be one way to do it, or having some other kind of threshold that at least anchors why Canada is involved and why it sees the necessity to become involved.
Those are the two points I would make.