Okay. Under that threshold, I'm not a big proponent of Canada's acting unilaterally in this way through the use of SEMA, although I think there are many things that Canada could do unilaterally outside of SEMA, including such things as travel bans, which fall entirely under Canada's authority. The difference between travel bans and economic measures is that it's entirely, I think, within Canada's right, and Canada absolutely should make decisions about who comes and goes from our country. We're a sovereign state, and if we don't want gross human rights violators coming here, they shouldn't come. IRPA already allows for that.
In taking actions against a foreign state about human rights violations that occur outside of Canada, it's very much my view that it's something that, if Canada wants to go down that road, it should be doing on a multilateral basis through SEMA. Otherwise, there are all kinds of other foreign policy tools available, including doing things such as supporting human rights groups on the ground who publicize a lot of this stuff and help it to see the light of day.
Others may have views.