Right. If Canada were to act through SEMA, either by broadening the provisions under SEMA or by passing an individual Magnitsky Act, the intention would be for Canada to act together with the United States, and I think the desire by Mr. Browder, which he's expressed in the past, is that includes the European Union, as well. I think that is his motivation, and I think he's spoken to this committee in the past. One of the very big differences between the United States, the European Union, and Canada, as has already been said, is our relative size. It's not a bad thing that Canada is not a prime destination for corrupt money around the world. That's a good thing. The ability of the United States and the European Union, particularly because the United Kingdom is a global financial centre, to have, potentially...and I don't know the extent to which assets and funds are located in these countries, but the idea is that potentially these countries would have more impact. Not knowing the state of Russian finances in Canada, but assuming it's not a primary destination for corrupt money, if Canada were to pass this, then I think it would largely be a symbolic measure.
On October 26th, 2016. See this statement in context.