I would add that these targeted measures, which I think they've referred to as smart sanctions, are a step forward. They've been used more often recently. To the extent that we're able to avoid the broader measures, which are blunter sticks, when we impose financial services bans, or import or export bans, and instead are able to narrow this to individuals, provided the proper protections are in place, then I don't see concerns with this. I do see a very strong signal that's sent when Canada signs onto that, even if it is largely symbolic on the Canadian side.
These days there are more and more reports about allegations of wealth being moved to Canada by corrupt officials, largely in the Far East. We know Canada is struggling with that, and there's money laundering allegations there. I'm not sure Canada is as isolated from that as others may think. There is money moving into Canada that might be illegitimate, and these measures may be appropriate to target that. I would keep in mind, though, that because of its size, as Meredith mentioned earlier, the United States is the main player here. When someone is designated national or listed by the United States, then that has implications around the world. I'm not saying Canadian companies necessarily always follow that designation and refuse to do business with them, but that has a huge reputational impact. When they make a move like that, whether Canada does anything or not, that can still have a very large impact.