As I've already said, I prefer using the smart and targeted sanctions. That's very much what we are talking about here. I know everyone has the best of intentions when it comes to gross human rights violators, and we want to make sure that we not only send that signal you were talking about earlier, but actually put into effect something that has real meaning and that is put into effect by our exporters, banks, and big financial institutions so that they are really participating in this and it's effective. As I said before, they are on the front lines of this.
I am not against broadening it to gross human rights violators, but my caution here, as we go forward in doing this, is that we have to fix the administration of this. I may sound like a broken record, but I'll give you a quick example. When names are put on the Canadian list, often it's just a name that's added to the list, and no other detail. We've had situations.... This happened with Burma sanctions in the last few months, where there was a name on it. We act for a company that was thinking of engaging in transactions with a company by that name in Burma. There were slight differences. We had a suspicion that it could be that entity, so we called up Global Affairs, but they could not give us any assurance as to whether that was the entity named or not. It's a crazy situation. If we can't get that guidance, if we can't properly identify who these parties are on these lists and enable companies and banks to identify them, it's not going to have any practical effect.