I might add that it's important to note that SEMA, the current legislation, can allow sanctions in relation to human rights violations. As we've mentioned previously, that's either where one of the organizations or associations of states that we're party to calls upon its membership to take action or where the Governor in Council deems there's a serious breach of international peace and security that has or may result in an international crisis. It's not a theoretical construct. We've done so in the case of Burma, Zimbabwe, and Syria. Canada also imposes UN sanctions to the UN Act, which may include sanctions for violations relating to human rights.
Should consideration be given to amending SEMA to include an explicit human rights justification, a number of considerations would need to be examined, for example, what specific circumstances would warrant a sanction in response to human rights violations, and what the implications of such a mechanism would be if it were to be used, whether that's, from a diplomatic, an operational, legal, or other...including for the public. Human rights is a broad concept.