Absolutely. For me, that's the biggest, and on two levels. One is what the threat is in the particular situation—be it Burma, Ukraine, or whatever—and specifically defining why it's put under the threat to international peace and security. Then, very importantly, when are you going to hold an individual responsible, and why? That should be specified in objective criteria. When it's an official of that state, that's fine. At least you've said what it is, or when it's someone who's in the military, whoever it may be. To me, that's what's missing, because it's not specified. If I were the individual listed, I'd have no idea. Well, I'd probably know, but it should be specified in the order.
On November 23rd, 2016. See this statement in context.