Practically, what we see—and as I said, we work with law enforcement pretty much around the world—is that the challenge still is that although police are investigating corruption, they oftentimes do not actually trace assets. People may go behind bars and after 10 years come out of their prison cell and still have amazing amounts of money stashed away in other jurisdictions. That really doesn't deter anyone. In some countries, it's actually quite all right to live in a prison, especially if you can bribe your way out of it every weekend. I do think that taking the money away is an extremely important deterrent; if there's anything, this is the most effective.
In terms of some of the countries we work in, we have recently seen, through the work we've done in one country in Africa—in Kenya, actually—a 4,000% increase in successful corruption cases that we have brought to court, with similar amounts of assets confiscated, for the first time in the history of Kenya. This is now making headlines in the newspapers almost every day. You can imagine that maybe they are not entirely scared yet, but certainly they are starting to listen a little more. I do think that this is the most effective deterrent, yes.
Can I just add two words on the evidence and the intelligence, if I may?
I would like to encourage you to look into a number of ways of working with other jurisdictions to actually get access to evidence and intelligence from other jurisdictions. There are plenty of opportunities, including the FIU-to-FIU channels and joint investigation teams. You can work through vetted teams, as the U.S. does a lot in financial crimes in Africa and in countries that are harder to access. There are numerous well-established law enforcement practices that can be used. That refers to the previous question, but I think that in practice there are numerous ways of dealing with this issue.