The $1.1 trillion—it's hard for me to imagine these figures—is an estimation by the global financial integrity initiative, and that includes the so-called illicit flows. This may be legally earned money that leaves a country for tax evasion purposes, as well as proceeds of corruption and other forms of crime.
I would like combine this comment with something that was said earlier about the end game.
The point is that all these efforts—fighting corruption, stopping illicit financial flows, returning stolen assets—is not just around corruption. Corruption, in a sense, is one of the root causes of almost every global crime. Terrorism, human trafficking, modern slavery issues, all the security concerns we have—even illegal immigration, as silly as that term is, or trafficking in immigrants—are all possible only because we have such a huge amount of corruption, so we need to see this as much bigger.
I like to refer to the $1.1 trillion because although it's not all due to corruption, corruption is behind most of the crime that have led to the $1.1 trillion. I think this is something that we don't want to acknowledge, and our financial centres are still much too protected.
We can call it “letting themselves be misused” or “being misused.” I don't mind which way we turn the words around, but the same debate applies in Switzerland. The banks and the international financial centres are definitely not doing enough to stop the money coming into our centres, and we have an obligation to do more about that.