Hélène, I'm not sure I'm following you. You want to proceed on the order in council that was a special adviser versus.... That's the way the motion reads, no? It just doesn't say that at all, so really, you can pursue that in your questioning of Mr. McCallum and Mr. Dion.
For the sake of the committee, I'll give you my own personal view as the chair and as a parliamentarian. This committee should take the opportunity with high-profile appointments of the government, no matter who's in power, to proceed with some questions to them. I have no difficulty supporting the idea that both Mr. McCallum and Mr. Dion should come before the committee. They're very seasoned veterans who know their way around and have been in front of committees many times over the last two decades, so I really don't see that as an issue.
I want to make sure that we have support for the idea of video conferencing, because it's pretty hard to expect Mr. McCallum to come all the way back to Canada when he just got to China. If we agree with that, if my colleagues agree with that, we could put out the invitation and proceed with the motion, unless there's some other reason. Before we even get to having them in front of the committee, I suspect Mr. Dion will be an ambassador as well, and he'll be able to speak to the structure. I know what the structure is, but for the record, it will be up to him to tell you how that all works.
Peter, do you have some comments?