Yet, it's ironic, because the World Bank, frankly, is where there is far more waste. If you want to talk social welfare and sort of be a right-wing analyst on this view, there is far more valid criticism about how the World Bank doesn't right a tight ship as much as the IMF does. It's really quite peculiar.
I don't think so. I've watched executive board deliberations, and I don't think there's that view. Of course, it plays well in Congress that the Americans are the ones who get to appoint the World Bank president.
On that front, President Kim has been reappointed. The Obama administration made sure it was done early. It was a five-year term, so that the American administration that came in, potentially Trump, wouldn't try to put in someone else who was disastrous like they had in the previous years, people like Wolfowitz and others. I mean, they don't....
I don't think that's a big issue to be honest with you, but it definitely plays into the right-wing element of Congress, for sure.