Mr. Chair, may I add a footnote?
I see the plausibility of the argument that Professor Hampson is offering. In the past, I think it would have been absolutely clear and a convincing position to take, but I'm not so sure that the new administration follows the same rules that existed before. I would have to say that I'm not totally convinced that if the outcome was considered to be unfavourable to the United States, they wouldn't say, “Okay: it's over.”
That doesn't mean that it couldn't be revisited. It doesn't mean that there wouldn't be all kinds of interesting things that would happen. It doesn't mean that it wouldn't be extremely damaging to existing supply chains and so on. But I think the assumption that the United States is just going to be boxed into a corner because of time might not be something we want to test.