No. In fact, the grounds for the Supreme Court decision were based on the fact that the visits that took place were not consular visits. They were Canadians who were there who participated in interrogations. It wasn't, strictly speaking, a consular case per se. But we did learn important lessons from that experience that we've applied to new protocols, which are now in place to avoid such scenarios taking place again.
On October 5th, 2017. See this statement in context.