Please, give me one moment.
Could we hear from whoever at the department was involved in the conversations? I'll quote Professor Kent Roach, a well-known professor when it comes to preambles. He says,
Preambles can oversell legislation either by expressing unrealistic hopes that are not always supported by the fine print or the text of the law or by suggesting that “we can have it all”.
The lawyer in me would much rather have a specific section that shows reasonable use by a hunter or a sport shooter to be excluded, as opposed to a preamble. A preamble has less weight than specific text of law. Is that fair to say, Mr. Brookfield?