What my friends in the government sometimes try to suggest is that the legitimate concerns you spoke about would be best addressed by a specific carve-out. This was not acted upon. It's my understanding—I was not in cabinet at the time, nor was I an MP in 2011—that Canada suggested specific carve-outs to address reasonable concerns, but we're going to tell these people that their concerns are addressed by the preamble.
Is it fair to say it would be more clear if their concerns were addressed specifically with a section in the treaty itself?