I'll jump in here just because of the time, if that's okay.
I want to get a bit more specific and to get your opinion on some of the suggestions we heard earlier. We heard this morning from a number of groups who represent firearms owners in Canada. They expressed their strong support for a robust system of arms control that effectively keeps weapons out of the hands of bad actors around the world, but they are concerned about the impact of this legislation on responsible firearms owners, sport shooters and hunters here in Canada. They asked us for, in the spirit of greater clarity in the legislation, which is not something you addressed specifically, clear language, not just in the preamble but in the legislation itself, that carves out and protects the rights of responsible, law-abiding firearms owners in Canada.
I'd be curious to hear your perspective on that kind of language and even on what such an exception could look like in a way that would not infringe on some of your particular concerns.